The new Smithsonian Magazine arrived yesterday and as I sipped my coffee sitting in my re-creation of the natural world nestled in my urban backyard, I found myself reflecting on the interplay of complexity with our desire for simplicity and dominance in the race to educate.
The article that set me on this course was one relating to the discovery of the
higgs boson, sometimes called the 'God particle.' It begins with a young Albert Einstein sick in bed. His father brings him a compass and Einstein's thoughts are transformed. The magnetic field invisibly and without fail moves the needle. Einstein wonders if the universe might be controlled by elegant invisible forces not unlike magnetism. The article then fast forwards to the story of a young physicist with similar thoughts about a "field" that fills the void between particles much as water fills a fishbowl. He describes this field with a mathematical formula, but his initial attempt to publish fails because the idea seems, to the refereed journals, preposterous.
As a 7th grader I was part of the guinea pig generation for "new math." It was a valiant attempt to teach math by teaching the principles behind it. Our first foray into this mystical realm was the binary system. The rising use of computers no doubt drove that.
It was fun to convert base 10 into binary. Performing ordinary operations in the binary system was frustrating. It is like trying to read a color word in a box when the word is printed in a different color than the word. It sounds easy enough, but the brain seeing RED written as GREEN hesitates as it fights to read the word and not the color. Working in another base is a bit like that. Amazingly, the thoughts brought on by this simple exposure were wondrously deep and have changed my approach to life in a way Mr. Ryder could never have guessed. These thoughts flooded through my 7th grade imagination....
- We probably use base ten because our primitive ancestors used their fingers for calculation and there are ten of those! (HMMMmmm I wonder if aliens might be comfortable in base 12 if they had six fingers on their hands?!)
- Our understanding of our world is deeply rooted in our physical being.
- What if we could see the full spectrum of color--how would that change our perception of the universe?
- All our scientific formulas are just DESCRIPTIONS-- of perceptions based on our physical observations! REALITY IS SUBJETIVE! We may never be able to reach that truly elegant level of scientific description because we are limited by perceptions.
The point of this rambling is simplicity itself. I was blessed to grow up at the beginning of educational reform and insanity when there was still time for reflection and not everything was carefully monitored. Today I would never have been in that math class which we would call AP math. Math was not my forte. But in those days I was in that class because of my scores on everything else! Without that class, I might have missed a major life-changing insight!
Today education is focused narrowly driven by 'outcomes.' We demand that kids learn certain things before they move on to others, without realizing just how NON LINEAR the universe is. This focus on formulas and facts doesn't provide the possibilities or reflective time students needed to develop their own deeper universal meanings. We don't allow children the opportunity to give voice to the ineffable beauty that God has surrounded us with.
Our schools are being driven by people who are too inexperienced and too grounded in business culture to hear any of this and our teachers, who fear for their ever more marginalized positions, are not shouting this from the rooftops. Point me to a rooftop please!
