Ravitch, one of the early education reformers, has concluded that not only were there problems with education, but there a
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e7fa/4e7fa9a277a3b9de8701448524173486f8603057" alt=""
In fact, I think these two issues as well as those of environmental concern converge in the fact that our entire society has been asking the wrong questions and using the wrong measures for some time. For years we have used the GDP as a measure of national success. But a new measure has emerged in recent years, the GNH has raised in important issue. In this world should we just measure gross national product or commerce or should we measure gross national happiness?
Is it reasonable on a finite planet to believe that there is unending growth ahead --- is it reasonable that the world should all replicate the American model of every person having a mcmansion and several cars? AND did those things make Americans any happier? Many Americans are talking about sustainability and environmental issues apart from the simple question just posed. There is the small home movement, the slow food movement, the small carbon footprint movement.
There is a simplicity movement afoot (no pun intended) What is the value in life --- is it the hours we work per day, the product that we make--- in the evidence of our success by virtue of the stuff we own? One tribal person in South America who was hearing about the union fight in the United States to limit the work day to 8 hours burst into laughter. When asked why he was laughing he replied, "We only work 3-4 hours a day!" I guess it is all your perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment